New Evidence on the Finite Sample Properties of Propensity Score Matching and Reweighting Estimators
نویسندگان
چکیده
Currently available asymptotic results in the literature suggest that matching estimators have higher variance than reweighting estimators. The extant literature comparing the finite sample properties of matching to specific reweighting estimators, however, has concluded that reweighting performs far worse than even the simplest matching estimator. We resolve these puzzling conclusions. Specifically we show that the findings from the finite sample analyses are not inconsistent with asymptotic analysis, but are very specific to particular choices regarding the implementation of reweighting, and fail to generalize to settings likely to be encountered in actual empirical practice. JEL Classification: C14, C21, C52.
منابع مشابه
New Evidence on the Finite Sample Properties of Propensity Score Reweighting and Matching Estimators∗
Frölich (2004) compares the finite sample properties of reweighting and matching estimators of average treatment effects and concludes that reweighting performs far worse than even the simplest matching estimator. We argue that this conclusion is unjustified. Neither approach dominates the other uniformly across data generating processes (DGPs). Expanding on the Frölich’s (2004) analysis, this ...
متن کاملFinite Sample Properties of Semiparametric Estimators of Average Treatment Effects∗
We explore the finite sample properties of several semiparametric estimators of average treatment effects, including propensity score reweighting, matching, double robust, and control function estimators. When there is good overlap in the distribution of propensity scores for treatment and control units, reweighting estimators are preferred on bias grounds and attain the semiparametric efficien...
متن کاملThe finite sample performance of semi- and non-parametric estimators for treatment effects and policy evaluation
The Finite Sample Performance of Semiand Nonparametric Estimators for Treatment Effects and Policy Evaluation This paper investigates the finite sample performance of a comprehensive set of semiand nonparametric estimators for treatment and policy evaluation. In contrast to previous simulation studies which mostly considered semiparametric approaches relying on parametric propensity score estim...
متن کاملComparing continuous treatment matching methods in policy evaluation
The paper evaluates the statistical properties of two different matching estimators in the case of continuous treatment, using a Montecarlo experiment. The traditional generalized propensity score matching estimator is compared whit a new two steps matching estimator for the continuous treatment case, recently developed [1]. It compares treatment and control units similar in terms of their obse...
متن کاملاستفاده از Propensity Score برای همسان سازی نمونه ها در یک مطالعه مورد شاهدی
Background and Aim: Case-Control studies provide evidence in the area of health. Validity and accuracy of such studies depend to a large extent on the similarity (similar distributions) of the case and control groups according to confounding variables. Matching is a method for controlling or eliminating the effects of important confounders. Matching using propensity score has recently been intr...
متن کامل